The 33rd Governance Institute of Australia national conference got underway in Sydney this morning. Some 160 'governance professionals' assembled from around Australia to explore the role of the company secretary, and emerging governance thinking and practice. This, the first of several conference reports, covers the first session of the two-day conference. (Note: these updates are not exhaustive accounts of ever session. Rather they provide summaries of key points made by presenters and observations from an interested delegate.)
  • The conference was opened by the GIA President Simon Pordage, after which Hon. Kelly O'Dwyer, the Minister for Revenue and Financial Services delivered a welcoming address by video link. O'Dwyer spoke about the government's legislative programme aimed at improving protection for shareholders. The brief message appeared to be well received by the audience, although the significance of the signal that the Turnbull government plans to implement a 'user pays' model at ASIC appeared to waft over most delegate's heads.
  • A panel of three regulators (John Price, ASIC; Geoff Summerhayes, APRA; and, David Barnett, ASX) were welcomed to the stage following O'Dwyer's welcome, to present a regulatory update. Each panel member offered a perspective including some rather candid observations including that many small companies treat corporate governance as a box-ticking exercise; and, that directors tend to view their own contributions optimistically (on the basis that we judge ourselves by intent, others by impact). Notwithstanding this, the overarching priority of the regulators and regulatory framework was then restated: to create an environment for efficient markets, fair rules and to catch miscreants.
  • Price noted that ASIC has an important role to play in terms of establishing trust and confidence in the equity market, after which Summerhayes added that this was crucial because the financial services sector (in particular) has taken its social licence for granted for many years. The panel then postulated that high levels of trust are an important indicator of a good culture and that culture is an indicator of (firm) performance.
  • The panel then moved on the present a raft of helpful technical updates, and to respond to questions from the conference floor.
The 33rd GIA conference promises much. The organisers have assembled a good programme and a strong line-up of speakers. However, the opening session felt like an opportunity missed. Why the organisers chose to lead out with a regulatory update (instead of a thought provoking message from a gifted communicator to reinforce the core theme of the conference) was beyond me and most of my table neighbours. Regardless, I look forward to the sessions that follow. More soon.